<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: weblogs.com, for RSS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://zengun.org/weblog/archives/2002/10/weblogscom-for-rss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://zengun.org/weblog/archives/2002/10/weblogscom-for-rss/</link>
	<description>bloggo ma non troppo</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Pearson</title>
		<link>http://zengun.org/weblog/archives/2002/10/weblogscom-for-rss/comment-page-1/#comment-10317</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2002 02:42:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=1930#comment-10317</guid>
		<description>Actually you can use the usual update method - weblogUpdates.ping( name, url, updateUrl, category ) - with category set to &#039;rss&#039;.  I&#039;m not entirely sure why the new rssUpdate() method is there, especially seeing as Radio actually uses weblogUpdate.ping().&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I wrote something about this here - http://www.pycs.net/devlog/2002/10/28/#200210282 - and got a reply from DW saying that either method is fine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually you can use the usual update method &#8211; weblogUpdates.ping( name, url, updateUrl, category ) &#8211; with category set to &#8216;rss&#8217;.  I&#8217;m not entirely sure why the new rssUpdate() method is there, especially seeing as Radio actually uses weblogUpdate.ping().</p>
<p>I wrote something about this here &#8211; <a href="http://www.pycs.net/devlog/2002/10/28/#200210282" rel="nofollow">http://www.pycs.net/devlog/2002/10/28/#200210282</a> &#8211; and got a reply from DW saying that either method is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

