Comments on: WikiPedos

By: haroon

haroon — Tue, 27 Dec 2005 07:12:03 +0000

since when is having a red star as your profile photo illegal? and as far as being a communist is concerned, its totally a person’s personal matter, no body has a right to judge others based on their beliefs.
And as far as endorsing the pedophilia thing is concerned, I have never seen any thing like that on Wikipedia.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:35:29 +0000

XiBe I am from Latvia excuse my english. I will try to write how I would speak the english. The people who started lawsuit, they tried to advertise their commercial product on wikipedia yes.

They get censored and angry, they make lawsuit, yah.

By: XiBe

XiBe — Thu, 15 Dec 2005 17:36:39 +0000

Anon : please write something that makes sense.
As for Wikipedia not allowing commercial endorsment, since when is that subject to debate ?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 15 Dec 2005 15:51:55 +0000

No that’s not the reason. The reason is that editors censored commercial endorshipment of the products the people who initiated the law suit because wikipedia doesn’t allow commercial endorsment like that.

By: Ganf

Ganf — Thu, 15 Dec 2005 12:23:43 +0000

J’ai eu un à priori m’incitant à trouver leur réaction injustifié mais après avoir lu leur texte et suivi les liens, je me dis qu’il y a tout de même un fond sur lequel ils ont raison et un problème avec l’article anglais sur la pédophilie.

(pour l’étoile il leur aurait suffit de cliquer dessus et lire à quoi elle correspond pour voir qu’ils délirent complètement sur leur sous-entendu).

By: neuro

neuro — Wed, 14 Dec 2005 14:37:49 +0000

Rhaaaaaaa tous les mêmes ces communistes, je le savais!