Comments for zengun

Comment on hey feed reader, I read that in my browser by David Ward

David Ward — Tue, 06 May 2008 11:11:58 +0000

I dont get it?

Comment on hey feed reader, I read that in my browser by padawan

padawan — Tue, 06 May 2008 00:29:12 +0000

Not sure I’m following you on everything. Yep, nice to have those computers do a lot more than they currently do but it’s not trivial.

First, I think you’re not used enough to NNW ;-). The way I (and I reckon most of NNW users) use the app is to first read all items in the main window, sometimes selecting an interesting post by double-clicking its title or simply typing Enter (in “combined view” it then opens it as a tab in the background, so you can continue parsing items and later browse your selected tabs in their full glory in what is essentially Safari embedded in NNW).

Then, on many “prolific” feeds I read, I sometimes double-click on the feed title in the feeds list to open their home page (effectively marking all unread items as read in that feed).

Lastly, (same as above) I sometimes go directly to the site and read what’s on the home page, for those sites that publish their entire posts and not just an excerpt. I would click on a particular permalink only if I want to read the comments and/or react. In this case, you would not have any indication of what I’ve effectly read since I don’t necessarily have to (need to, want to…) click on each post URL to read it.

Nice idea, but unpractical as it seems…

Comment on digging into boring Pi, getting out of boring time by Roland Hesz

Roland Hesz — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 17:56:01 +0000

We at least know you still around :)

Comment on Today I talk about Michael Jackson to u!!!!!!! by Evelyn Nelson

Evelyn Nelson — Wed, 09 Apr 2008 04:07:56 +0000

Michael if this really gets to you I first want to let you know I appreciate your giftings/talents sent from heaven above. I’d like to know if you are looking to produce movies and what kind? Do you buy scripts or songs to help amateurs such as myself?

Comment on is this you, Jesus? by Nico

Nico — Mon, 03 Mar 2008 13:35:54 +0000

Jesus doesn`t have time, to take a look.

Comment on we’re hiring / on embauche by Specialized Bikeshop

Specialized Bikeshop — Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:28:54 +0000

Unfortunately Iam to late to apply for that job. Maybe next time.

Bon journée

Beni

Comment on Hello, world. by WordPress › Blog » Planet WordPress

WordPress › Blog » Planet WordPress — Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:22:24 +0000

[…] Michel Valdrighi (feed) […]

Comment on sous huitaine by Dark-Hitoshi

Dark-Hitoshi — Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:53:58 +0000

Ben moi c’est pareil!!

J’ai payé le 15!!

15/02 prélèvement encaissé le 15/02/2008 11:53.

19/02/2008 votre commande est éditée dans nos entrepôts et rentre en phase de
préparation.

lun 18/02/2008
15:49 BORDEAUX CHRONOPOST
Envoi prêt chez l’expéditeur

mar 19/02/2008
16:11 BORDEAUX CHRONOPOST
Tri agence de départ effectué

mer 20/02/2008
06:07 TOULON CHRONOPOST
Tri agence d’arrivée effectuée

mer 20/02/2008
07:15 TOULON CHRONOPOST
Envoi en cours de livraison

et après c’est le pire cdiscount vien a peine d’envoyer le 2eme colis que j’ai commandé le 15 aussi!!!!

Comment on Patience et Longueur de temps sont morts pendus by Arrangeur

Arrangeur — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:13:45 +0000

voilà, c’est juste uncpetit mot pour te dire que j’aprécie de te lire ;)

Comment on is this you, Jesus? by Brokenglish.blogspot.com

Brokenglish.blogspot.com — Thu, 07 Feb 2008 21:45:20 +0000

if jesus were here, he would be locked up.

Comment on a one year hiatus by mike

mike — Wed, 06 Feb 2008 04:41:41 +0000

kinda strange, but i saw some photos on flickr, which took me to the John Ha’s Weblog, which brought me here. I just have one question for john and that was did that heavy lift ship sink?. im sorry for being so blunt, but i can be seen at a myspace page mike mars, wheeling, illinois, 60090

regardless, thank you, for 4 your time

Comment on Stalin vs Hitler by Chelsea

Chelsea — Thu, 17 Jan 2008 20:41:42 +0000

I was just reading your thing about how apparently hitler killed 42 million and i just wanted to correct you and say that stalin had a larger death toll being 25-30 million people when hitler only had 11 million. But thanks for the false information.

Comment on Today I talk about Michael Jackson to u!!!!!!! by lisa and phil

lisa and phil — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 10:01:14 +0000

this is my number call lisa and phil on 07516573284 could we please meet you x

Comment on Today I talk about Michael Jackson to u!!!!!!! by lisa and phil

lisa and phil — Mon, 29 Oct 2007 09:59:01 +0000

can me and and my boyfriend meet u beacuse we love your songs and we would like to talk what your going to do net please get up and get out there and do more songs you are a amazing dont lisson about what people say think for self and your fans ps good luck if you do luv from lisa and phil

Comment on from Corsica with love, part 2 by michel v

michel v — Sat, 27 Oct 2007 22:04:24 +0000

evita : a restaurant that got bombed some decade ago, that’s still not rebuilt.

Comment on from Corsica with love, part 2 by evita

evita — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:31:49 +0000

i love this first photo - what is it exactly?
~e

Comment on unlinkable vertigo by evita

evita — Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:30:32 +0000

this is a very interesting way of displaying photographs. thanks for sharing.
please check out my new photoblog.
any other interesting places to visit for new media photography?
have a most beautiful day! : )
~e

Comment on forced by Armin

Armin — Sun, 21 Oct 2007 17:11:28 +0000

I have question. How do You reach to this kigk PageRank

Comment on not getting things done by Steve M

Steve M — Fri, 12 Oct 2007 03:02:21 +0000

I’m currently reading about people taking time to do what really matters to them and Not Getting Things Done. Works for me

Comment on can you increment i? by Rahul

Rahul — Fri, 05 Oct 2007 20:07:25 +0000

Hi! I tried the code on C and C++ both, and its same in both cases.
int main()
{
int value,i=1;
value=i + i++ + ++i;
printf(”%d”,value);
i=1;
i += i++ + ++i;
printf(” %d”,i);
return 0;
}

Next i tried it with both volatile and without volatile keyword on “i”. Now the catch is:-
1) Without volatile, i.e. with optimization, the answer is 4 7
2) With Volatile, i.e. without optimization, the answer is 4 5

**Will anybody make it clear why the answer in first part is 7 and in other is 5, what effect does optimization have on this???